News
Community Safety Department Director To Resign Amid Tension With Cambridge Police Department
News
From Lab to Startup: Harvard’s Office of Technology Development Paves the Way for Research Commercialization
News
People’s Forum on Graduation Readiness Held After Vote to Eliminate MCAS
News
FAS Closes Barker Center Cafe, Citing Financial Strain
News
8 Takeaways From Harvard’s Task Force Reports
The Princeton University faculty last week voted 97 to 36 to discontinue the "Princeton Plan", which provided for a pre-election recess to allow students to work for political candidates.
A poll taken in 1970 revealed that one-quarter of the student body worked for candidates during the 1970 recess and a considerably lower percentage was expected to work this year.
The plan was discontinued primarily because it cost Princeton an additional $53,715 to keep the buildings open and feed and house the 460 athletes who stayed on campus to train during the 11 day recess.
To compensate for the suspension of classes, the faculty added 11 days to the academic year. Extension of the term cost the students an estimated $300,000 in summer wages.
James Dorsey, editor of the Daily Princetonian, said yesterday that the students had expected the plan would be discontinued and had not protested the faculty vote.
It Was Coming
"Everybody knew it was coming," Dorsey said. "No faculty member felt strongly about it, even the radical professors who now believe more in working outside of the system. There were not enough professors in the middle in 1972 to favor it."
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.