News
After Court Restores Research Funding, Trump Still Has Paths to Target Harvard
News
‘Honestly, I’m Fine with It’: Eliot Residents Settle In to the Inn as Renovations Begin
News
He Represented Paul Toner. Now, He’s the Fundraising Frontrunner in Cambridge’s Municipal Elections.
News
Harvard College Laundry Prices Increase by 25 Cents
News
DOJ Sues Boston and Mayor Michelle Wu ’07 Over Sanctuary City Policy
The Committee on Rights and Responsibilities (CRR) yesterday afternoon defended its read missions procedures in a closed meeting with the Commission of Inquiry, according to two Commission members.
The Commission called the meeting to investigate complaints filed against the CRR by Sanford Kreisberg, a fourth-year graduate student in English. Kreisberg claimed that the CRR's criterion for readmission-existence of a "potential danger of further violation" -was "vague and inherently political."
According to Commission members Marshall B. Strauss '72 and Doris H. Kearns, assistant professor of Government, the members of the CRR conceded that Kreisberg's complaints were technically correct, but still maintained that the read missions procedures were the fairest possible under the circumstances.
"The committee also agreed with the charge that the criterion was political, but pointed out in its defense that every resolution passed by every group is necessarily political," Strauss said yesterday.
Donald G. Anderson. McKay Professor of Applied Mathematics and CRR chairman, refused yesterday to discuss the meeting.
The next step in the Commission's investigation would be to interview students who applied for readmission last Fall. Roger Rosenblatt, assistant professor of English and Commission chairman, said last night.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.