News
In Fight Against Trump, Harvard Goes From Media Lockdown to the Limelight
News
The Changing Meaning and Lasting Power of the Harvard Name
News
Can Harvard Bring Students’ Focus Back to the Classroom?
News
Harvard Activists Have a New Reason To Protest. Does Palestine Fit In?
News
Strings Attached: How Harvard’s Wealthiest Alumni Are Reshaping University Giving
The three radical groups that planned the disruption of last Friday's off-B'way SRO, "Counter Teach-In," have claimed that their actions were a boffo performance, in spite of a mounting number of students pans.
The three groups were SDS, University Action Group and Liberation Alliance.
At a meeting Monday night, SDS members were unanimous in calling the disruption a complete success. "This was the largest mass action I've seen on this campus in my four years here," reminisced Ira D. Helfand '71. "We should use this to build up a tremendous momentum to fight the war."
A representative of SDS National Headquarters in Chicago who attended the meeting reported the Chicago office was "really spurred on" by Friday night's events.
A spokesman for UAG, an organization of radical graduate students and faculty members, agreed that the disruption had been a "tremendous success" in building antiwar sentiment.
Although the UAG spokesman acknowledged that "probably a majority" of the students are opposed to the disruption, he said that it showed the Vietnam policy planners that there is a "live and kicking" antiwar movement on college campuses.
Members of the Liberation Alliance at a meeting yesterday disagreed about whether the disruption was a success. Many members agreed with SDS and UAG that it had been a "complete success," but others said that it was a bad tactic for building mass, popular support. "It looks as though we've come out on the bad side of an issue, in the eyes of most students," one admitted.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.