News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil
News
Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum
News
Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta
News
After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct
News
Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds
To the Editors of the Crimson:
The letter published in the Crimson (Nov. 16) by seventeen members of the Department of Linguisties ends with a certain irony. While these linguists assure us that the English language is not unduly prejudiced against women, we note with interest that apparently only three of the seventeen signers are women, the last of whom is identified laconically as "Secretary". What an apt symbol for the subjection of women in our society! Whatever the linguistic value of 'marked' and 'unmarked' members of linguistic pairs, is it not curious that common usage often marks 'Secretary' as female and last in line? Laura Mavis Gordon Teaching Fellow in Slavic Languages and Literatures Assistant Tutor in Eliot House Patrick J. Ryan, S.J. Teaching Fellow in General Education Tutor in Eliot House
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.