News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
To the Editors of the CRIMSON:
With respect to Edward Gruson's letter re: Harvard vs. The Cambridge Free School, one thing puzzles me-he says, "... we asked the owner to permit the school to remain in the building..."-it seems to me that Harvard might have done something a good deal stronger than ask-why could they not have said, since they were buying the building, "we want this building to stand with the school using it until we can find a mutually satisfactory replacement." To hear Mr. Gruson, one might suppose that Harvard was helpless in the matter.
I'm afraid I do not find Mr. Gruson's statement altogether convincing. For several years now the Davises have worked very hard, for little or no salary, to found and operate the Free School. I do not believe that they would have let it close if there had seemed to them the slightest possibility of keeping it open, any more than I believe that if Harvard had been seriously interested in keeping it open, they could not have found some means of doing so.
In short, when an elephant steps on a mouse, it's hard for me to believe that it's the mouse's fault.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.