News

Adams Alumni Go Nuts for Newly Renovated House

News

A Better Cambridge Announces Endorsements in City Council Race, Giving Boost to Incumbents

News

HUA Kicks Off With Inaugural Meeting Under New Administration

News

Harvard Ends Undergraduate Minority Recruitment Program as Trump Targets Race in Admissions

News

Memorial Church Reduces Programming Amid University Budget Cuts

Cox Argues 1964 Murder Appeal

By The ASSOCIATED Press

Archibald C. Cox '34, Williston Professor of Law, yesterday began arguing a case before the United States Supreme Court challenging the legality of search warrants and evidence seizure practices used by New Hampshire officials in obtaining a conviction in the highly publicized 1964 murder of 14-year-old Pamela Mason.

Cox, former Solicitor General of the United States, told the court that the constitutional rights of Edward H. Coolidge Jr. were violated by the admission of evidence from his house and his car.

Cox argued during the hour-long hearing that the search warrant which netted the evidence from Coolidge's car was issued by the chief prosecutor, the then state attorney general William Maynard, instead of "a neutral and detached magistrate." Cox said that the reasons given for the warrant were insufficient to determine probable cause and that the police lacked a warrant when they seized a rifle and some clothing from Coolidge's home.

Alexander J. Kalinski, representing New Hampshire, argued that the original trial court upheld the validity of the procedures and the state Supreme Court sustained them.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags