News
After Court Restores Research Funding, Trump Still Has Paths to Target Harvard
News
‘Honestly, I’m Fine with It’: Eliot Residents Settle In to the Inn as Renovations Begin
News
He Represented Paul Toner. Now, He’s the Fundraising Frontrunner in Cambridge’s Municipal Elections.
News
Harvard College Laundry Prices Increase by 25 Cents
News
DOJ Sues Boston and Mayor Michelle Wu ’07 Over Sanctuary City Policy
The notion that professors scorn undergraduate teaching proved wrong according to Talcott Parsons, Professor of Sociology, and Gerald M. Platt, Lecturer on Sociology, in their 3-year study of the American academic profession.
The two sociologists, working on a $70,000 grant from the National Science Foundation, questioned 400 faculty members at eight institutions of varying size, quality, and research orientation.
They found that 82 per cent of the faculty at the larger institutions wanted an even balance between undergraduate and graduate teaching, while only 6 per cent wanted more graduate teaching. All the professors polled wished to increase their research time.
Reduce Administration
The study says, in part, "there is no significant tendency to wish to eliminate or even minimze any of the three substantive functions: teaching graduates, undergraduates, and research." But faculty members wished to reduce their administrative loads by half.
Parsons and Platt also found that academic freedom and tenure in office are more important than salary in attracting faculty members. However, they found that pressures to maintain competence are high under these conditions.
Based on a method developed during the course of study, the sociologists rated the institutions on a scale of Institutional Differentiation. They are using this scale to evaluate 116 institutions in a more thorough study of the academic profession to be released in 1970.
The scale was based on size, quality, and research-orientation of the institution. In those institutions rated highest by this scale, most of the professors said that they preferred to be influential members of their department rather than having formal authority as department chairmen.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.