News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil
News
Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum
News
Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta
News
After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct
News
Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds
HARVARD OFFICIALS announced last week that they would not be buying grapes in the foreseeable future. By however small a margin, the action has the effect of furthering the cause of the strikers, but administrative vice-president L. Gard Wiggins was careful to explain away even that small political gesture. Harvard wasn't taking a position on the strike, he said, grapes just won't be on the menu.
The pretense that Harvard has once again avoided any political commitment is a bit hard to accept in this case--and if Harvard is indeed still neutral on the grape strike, last week's action must have been taken exclusively to avoid unpleasantness with protesting students.
Harvard could have openly and gracefully agreed to join the grape boycott. By doing the right thing for the wrong reason, the University needlessly chose to be timid rather than responsible.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.