News
After Court Restores Research Funding, Trump Still Has Paths to Target Harvard
News
‘Honestly, I’m Fine with It’: Eliot Residents Settle In to the Inn as Renovations Begin
News
He Represented Paul Toner. Now, He’s the Fundraising Frontrunner in Cambridge’s Municipal Elections.
News
Harvard College Laundry Prices Increase by 25 Cents
News
DOJ Sues Boston and Mayor Michelle Wu ’07 Over Sanctuary City Policy
WASHINGTON, D.C. Jan. 31--Edwin O. Reischauer, University Professor, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee today that the bombing of North Vietnam is a "psychological blunder" and called for prudent de escalation."
The former Ambassador to Japan said that he supported the administration's objectives in Vietnam--"to bring the war to as speedy an end as possible without resorting to either of the dangerous alternatives of withdrawal or major escalation."
But the "fundamental direction" which he urged in U.S. Asian policy contradicted many of the premises of the Government's position on Vietnam.
In the future, he said, the U.S. should minimize military involvement and alignment, and play the role of a "friendly outside supporter of individual or collective Asian initiative," instead of a "leader. . . rallying allies to our policies."
The force of nationalism, he said, is far more effective in "defeating communism" than U.S. intervention.
Although halting the bombing might bring "more hope for negotiations," Reischauer said, there is little prospect of such a settlement "simply because the Viet Cong and the South Vietnamese are so far apart and so distrust each other."
Simmer Down
"I think in the long run," he added, "we have more chance of seeing the war simmer down" than end though negotiations.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.