News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil
News
Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum
News
Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta
News
After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct
News
Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds
WASHINGTON, D.C. Jan. 31--Edwin O. Reischauer, University Professor, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee today that the bombing of North Vietnam is a "psychological blunder" and called for prudent de escalation."
The former Ambassador to Japan said that he supported the administration's objectives in Vietnam--"to bring the war to as speedy an end as possible without resorting to either of the dangerous alternatives of withdrawal or major escalation."
But the "fundamental direction" which he urged in U.S. Asian policy contradicted many of the premises of the Government's position on Vietnam.
In the future, he said, the U.S. should minimize military involvement and alignment, and play the role of a "friendly outside supporter of individual or collective Asian initiative," instead of a "leader. . . rallying allies to our policies."
The force of nationalism, he said, is far more effective in "defeating communism" than U.S. intervention.
Although halting the bombing might bring "more hope for negotiations," Reischauer said, there is little prospect of such a settlement "simply because the Viet Cong and the South Vietnamese are so far apart and so distrust each other."
Simmer Down
"I think in the long run," he added, "we have more chance of seeing the war simmer down" than end though negotiations.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.