News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
A federal court jury last week awarded a Harvard Medical School professor $250,000 in a libel suit against an electric shaving machine manufacturer.
William R. Hill, Jr., instructor in Dermatology, brought suit against the Sperry-Rand Corp. for listing him as co-author of a magazine article which he did not write. The article, entitled "Modern Shaving Techniques in Relation to Lesions of the Skin," appeared in the March, 1961 edition of G. P. Magazine. 30,000 general practitioners, throughout the country subscribe to the magazine.
The article stated that electric shavers and specifially the Remington shaver, were less likely to cause lesions of the skin than regular razors. The claim was based on research supposedly done by the authors.
Remington Rand used the article as a reference in a ten-month world-wide campaign and offered interested readers reprints from the medical journal.
According to C. Keefe Hurley, Hill's attorney, the research attributed to Hill never took place, and Hill did not consent to the use of his name on the article. Hurley added that Sperry-Rand "stole Dr. Hill's name and stole his reputation."
Article 'Untrue'
Hill said that the article was "untrue," and charged that he was the object of ridicule and scorn because he was listed as an author.
Edward F. Finnerty, Jr., formerly of Tufts Medical School, and the late Salvatore J. Messina of Boston University School of Medicine, were listed as the other two co-authors. According to Hurley, Messina had not consented to use of his name, either.
Hurley said that the case is the first of its kind and that the award was one of the largest made in the U.S. District Court in Boston. He added that he had asked damages "for the purpose of deterring anyone from doing this in the future."
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.