News
Community Safety Department Director To Resign Amid Tension With Cambridge Police Department
News
From Lab to Startup: Harvard’s Office of Technology Development Paves the Way for Research Commercialization
News
People’s Forum on Graduation Readiness Held After Vote to Eliminate MCAS
News
FAS Closes Barker Center Cafe, Citing Financial Strain
News
8 Takeaways From Harvard’s Task Force Reports
Fanny's made the big time.
The United States Supreme Court decided yesterday to review the Massachusetts ban on John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure, the tale of an 18th century London prostitute.
G. P. Putnam's Sons, Fanny's New York publisher, appealed the April decision of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts that Fanny Hill is "obscene, impure, and indecent."
In Fanny's original trial, John M. Bullitt '43, professor of English, testified in Suffolk Superior Court that the book is of literary and historic merit. Bullitt was one of a series of professors brought into court in May, 1964 by Putnam's expert censorship lawyers. Charles I. Rembar '35 and Reuben Goodman '35.
The Court grouped Fanny with the cases of Ralph Ginzburg, publisher of Eros magazine, and a New Yorker arrested for having sadistic literature in his basement. The review could result in a total redefinition of Federal obscenity standards.
Meanwhile, in New Bedford, the Massachusetts courts began their suppression of yet another book. A bookseller was fined $1000 and sent to jail for a year for selling Henry Miller's Sexus.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.