News
Harvard Researchers Develop AI-Driven Framework To Study Social Interactions, A Step Forward for Autism Research
News
Harvard Innovation Labs Announces 25 President’s Innovation Challenge Finalists
News
Graduate Student Council To Vote on Meeting Attendance Policy
News
Pop Hits and Politics: At Yardfest, Students Dance to Bedingfield and a Student Band Condemns Trump
News
Billionaire Investor Gerald Chan Under Scrutiny for Neglect of Historic Harvard Square Theater
After seven days of frenzied consultation the CRIMSON'S twenty-five man board of judges has emerged from behind closed doors. Stern of countenance, after 168 consecutive hours of argument, the elders delivered the names of two crostic winners to the President of the CRIMSON in a sealed envelope. They then filed out the Plympton Street exit, muttering feverishly of "neatness," "originality," "aptness of thought," and "rounding up the usual suspects."
What were the criteria of victory? All was explained on a yellowed sheet of parchment locked within the judges' envelope. Had contestants noted, for example, that "Chocolates," "Elsie," "Parietals," and "Joust" were grossly misspelled? Had they recognized that "Bacterium" is singular, whereas "Cocci" is plural?
Perhaps desolate losers may find consolation in the fact that the elders' decision was not unanimous. Clark R. Chapman '66 and Robert E. Olsen '66 were pronounced victorious only by a consensus of twenty-three judges. There were two dissenting votes.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.