News
Harvard Quietly Resolves Anti-Palestinian Discrimination Complaint With Ed. Department
News
Following Dining Hall Crowds, Harvard College Won’t Say Whether It Tracked Wintersession Move-Ins
News
Harvard Outsources Program to Identify Descendants of Those Enslaved by University Affiliates, Lays Off Internal Staff
News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Class Session With Gazan Patients, Calling It One-Sided
News
Garber Privately Tells Faculty That Harvard Must Rethink Messaging After GOP Victory
'Cliffies gathered into four living rooms last night to discuss today's all-college referendum on the extension of liberal sign-out privileges to sophomores "in a well-bred manner, but with underlying hostility," as a freshman in East House put it.
The proposal would let sophomores merely estimate their sign out, to as late as they want or overnight. It was defeated by the RGA legislature on Dec. 12 by a 24 to 20 vote.
Sitting quietly in Cabot Hall's spacious living room, East House girls pondered Radcliffe's "vacuum of social pathos," "level of maturity," increased responsibilities," "desirable moral climate," and "existing condition of confusion."
In South House, however, where girls overflowed through the doors, sat and stood in uncomfortable crowds, and whispered to their neighbors, debate was much shorter. The only question discussed was the parliamentary status of the referendum, and the possibilities for further changes. Stephanie Rauschenbush '64, one of its two initiators, declared that though the referendum would only extend junior and senior rules to Thanksgiving of sophomore year, girls who want greater changes should still vote for the proposal.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.