News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

Professor Discounts Likelihood of Gov't Forcing Arbitration

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

Elliot J. Berg, assistant professor of Economics, said yesterday that he is highly skeptical whether federal legislators will ever force compulsory arbitration on labor and management.

Berg spoke lightly of a testimony before the House Merchant Marine Committee Wednesday that compulsory arbitration for maritime disputes "would be a great incentive for more effective collective bargaining." Solon B. Turman, chairman of Lykes Brothers Steamship Company Inc., giving the testimony, said that a threat of binding arbitration would induce labor and management to settle their disputes themselves.

These suggestions, Berg said, are contradicted by past experience. He said that in the past, when labor and management have been faced with a threat of compulsory arbitration, both sides have often preferred to let their problems be arbitrated instead of negotiating them themselves.

Berg further contended that "compulsory arbitration has never settled an issue."

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags