News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
The research director of the Republican National Committee has accused David Riesman of "strangely inverted logic" in his statement labeling Republican attacks on The Liberal Papers as "a new kind of McCarthyism."
In a recent letter to the Washington Post, William B. Prendergast said, "Never before has the claim been made that the right to express any point of view is impaired if a contrary point of view is expressed. Nor has the claim hitherto been made that free speech is impaired by noting a similarity between what the speaker says and what the Soviet Union says."
Prendergast's letter followed a communication Riesman sent to the Post, enlarging on comments he first made in the March 27 CRIMSON. In the CRIMSON story, Riesman had vigorously defended the Papers, a paperback collection of essays on foreign policy, against charges made by Rep. William E. Miller (R-N.Y.), the Republican National Chairman.
Miller claimed the Papers "not only repeat the Communist line--they go beyond the Communist line." The book was sponsored by the Liberal Project, a loose organization of liberal House Democrats that arranged discussions between scholars and legislators.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.