News
Community Safety Department Director To Resign Amid Tension With Cambridge Police Department
News
From Lab to Startup: Harvard’s Office of Technology Development Paves the Way for Research Commercialization
News
People’s Forum on Graduation Readiness Held After Vote to Eliminate MCAS
News
FAS Closes Barker Center Cafe, Citing Financial Strain
News
8 Takeaways From Harvard’s Task Force Reports
Twelve of the original 85 Federalist papers have never been definitely attributed to either of the principal authors, James Madison, or Alexander Hamilton. Statistical evidence shows that most of the disputed papers were written by James Madison, Charles F. Mosteller, professor of Mathematical Statistics, reported yesterday.
Mosteller is working on a project aimed at eliminating the long-standing problem of whether Hamilton or Madison wrote the unidentified papers by collecting and analyzing statistical data about them.
The major "index of authorship" used in Mosteller's study is a word count. "For instance," he explained, "Hamilton uses the word 'enough' often, Madison only rarely." Mosteller thus might be able to determine that an article with enough "enough's" was probably written by Hamilton, always checking by the use of the recurrent words.
"Only certain words prove helpful," Mosteller added, "and it is necessary to have a substantial theory about variation in word usage. What we call 'contextual' words, like 'war,' 'army,' and 'executive,' cannot be used for discriminatory purposes."
Complicated Style
Another "index of authorship," average sentence length, was employed in a statistical study done elsewhere to determine whether or not a single person wrote the lliad. Mosteller tried this but found that it would not work with the Federalist problem, because Madison and Hamilton wrote sentences similar in length, moreover, they both shared "a complicated style and phrasing."
Mosteller said that his study was probably more interesting as a statistical than as a historical problem since the authorship of the 11 papers is not of particular concern to most historians.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.