News

After Court Restores Research Funding, Trump Still Has Paths to Target Harvard

News

‘Honestly, I’m Fine with It’: Eliot Residents Settle In to the Inn as Renovations Begin

News

He Represented Paul Toner. Now, He’s the Fundraising Frontrunner in Cambridge’s Municipal Elections.

News

Harvard College Laundry Prices Increase by 25 Cents

News

DOJ Sues Boston and Mayor Michelle Wu ’07 Over Sanctuary City Policy

Harvard Rejects Engineering Plan

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

Moves by the George Washington University School of Engineering to abolish classification by year and to extend complete educational freedom to its students have stimulated Faculty interest here. Harvey Brooks, Dean of Engineering and Applied Physics, calls the new plans "very novel."

Instead of the traditional designations of freshman, sophomore, junior, and senior, the GWU school (located in Washington D.C.) will divide its students by their individual accomplishments.

Move at Own Pace

The students will be able to move at their own pace, selecting appropriate goals and standards. Faculty advisers will merely maintain a check on the students, orienting them in a general direction.

This is not extremely different, according to Brooks, from Harvard's present system. The Engineering School here, like the College, allows students to take whatever courses they are prepared for.

Brooks did add, however, that Harvard does not emphasize the type of individual supervision which the GWU plan will incorporate. He feels that the needs of engineering make a course structure necessary, and that engineering students must work within a flexible but nonetheless prescribed framework.

The Harvard Engineering school itself does not have any tutorial plan, although there is an accelerated non-credit tutorial for honors students. Brooks held that the University's present course structure barely prepares engineers in four years, without the problem of further acceleration.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags