News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil
News
Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum
News
Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta
News
After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct
News
Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds
"Arms control is a necessary step to disarmament," Louis B. Sohn, professor of Law, declared yesterday.
Speaking before the Hillel Round Table of World Affairs, the disarmament expert outlined policy differences between the United States and the Soviet Union on the disarmament question.
Sohn maintained that, since both nations want disarmament, the controversy is one of means, not ends. The Soviet Union advocates arms control in proportion to disarmament, he said. Thus a ten per cent decrease in arms would provide for an equal increase in inspection.
He suggested that gradual disarmament by territory rather than by arms might satisfy both nations. According to the plan, each country would distribute its arms in ten equally divided territories. The other nation would then choose one of these areas for fully controlled total disarmament.
"Though the problems of disarmament are great, they are not insuperable for nations of good will," Sohn concluded. "Certainly disarmament is a much safer alternative than the present arms race."
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.