News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

Pusey Labels Loyalty Oath 'Undesirable'

Letter From President Answers Law Club

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

President Pusey has replied to a letter from the Law-Graduate School Democratic Club which asked him to withdraw acceptance of government funds for student loans which require a loyalty oath from receivers.

In his response, Pusey agreed with the club concerning the undesirability of the oath," but claimed "we do not agree regarding the best way to register a protest." He did not elaborate or state what form a Harvard protest would take.

Both Pusey and President A. Whitney Griswold of Yale have written Secretary Arthur S. Fleming of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, criticizing the oath.

The Democrats' letter opposed University acceptance of $26,807, under the Defense Education Act of 1958. In addition to signing a loyalty oath, borrowers must must also swear that they do not believe in or support any organization that "believes in or teaches the overthrow of the United States Government."

Members of the club claimed the oath would engender "an atmosphere of intellectual conformity" in a university that "prides itself on its reputation as a center of intellectual independence and vigour."

"The price of receiving the funds is much too high," the letter, signed by club president Charles L. Edson 3L, asserted. The University "would lose a portion of its heritage worth more than $26,807."

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags