News
Harvard Researchers Develop AI-Driven Framework To Study Social Interactions, A Step Forward for Autism Research
News
Harvard Innovation Labs Announces 25 President’s Innovation Challenge Finalists
News
Graduate Student Council To Vote on Meeting Attendance Policy
News
Pop Hits and Politics: At Yardfest, Students Dance to Bedingfield and a Student Band Condemns Trump
News
Billionaire Investor Gerald Chan Under Scrutiny for Neglect of Historic Harvard Square Theater
Franklin Delano Roosevelt was not a radical, despite the "howls of calamity" attending many of his innovations, Arthur M. Schlesinger '38, professor of History, said last night in a radio discussion of his book, "The Coming of the New Deal."
The originator of the New Deal was a liberal "in the sense that he saw changes was inevitable and that government and society had to be remade," Schlesinger continued. Yet his aims were essentially conservative; he wanted to maintain American traditions and ideals.
Another charge leveled against Roosevelt is that his administrative machinery was confusing and haphazard, but this was merely Roosevelt's way of doing things, Schlesinger stated. "Bureaucracy stifles inventiveness and takes life out of government," he asserted.
Schlesinger regretted that individuals like FDR have disappeared from government, noting that "all public statements today sound alike." During the early days of the New Deal, there were real personalities, men who "made a difference in history," even if they did not literally alter the course of events, he added.
A great factor in Roosevelt's dominance was his belief that "politics were a matter of education," rather than intrigue, Schlesinger concluded, explaining that Roosevelt thought all the people should take part in government.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.