News
Penny Pritzker Says She Has ‘Absolutely No Idea’ How Trump Talks Will Conclude
News
Harvard Researchers Find Executive Function Tests May Be Culturally Biased
News
Researchers Release Report on People Enslaved by Harvard-Affiliated Vassall Family
News
Zusy Seeks First Full Term for Cambridge City Council
News
NYT Journalist Maggie Haberman Weighs In on Trump’s White House, Democratic Strategy at Harvard Talk
With the ever-increasing number of applicants for admission to the College, the problem of choosing the best student becomes a progressively difficult one. This difficulty is intensified by the fact that many applicants do not receive an interview from a member of the Admissions Committee.
The present employees of the Admissions Office do an exceptional job in proselytizing and interviewing throughout the nation. But they are few in number and much of the interviewing must be done by alumni of the College, or in some cases, by alumni of the Harvard graduate schools. Despite their Harvard background, alumni often do not know much about the present intellectual climate or undergraduate composition of the College. This lack of knowledge is not conducive to the selection of the candidates best able to benefit from a Harvard education.
By adding more traveling representatives, the Admissions Office would not only insure each applicant a qualified interviewer, but would stimulate interest in many superior secondary school students whom the Harvard dragnet does not now enmesh. This addition to the Admissions staff would certainly cost more money, but the selection of the best undergraduate body for Harvard College is certainly well worth the expenditure.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.