News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

Faculty Reaction To Cabinet Shift Mixed and Blunt

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

Qualified joy mingled with mild disappointment in the reactions of five Harvard professors to the announcement of Attorney General Herbert Brownell's resignation yesterday.

Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., professor of History said of the resignation and the proposed appointment of Deputy Attorney General William P. Rogers, "It would require talent to lower the standards of the office any further, but if anybody can do it, Rogers can."

Charles R. Cherington, professor of Government, was equally outspoken: "I'm delighted that he's out, but Rogers is worse. It means more of the police state." Robert G. McCloskey, also professor of Government, commented that he was afraid that Brownell's formal resignation did not mean he would lose his political influence, which, McCloskey said, "has been pernicious in the extreme."

Arthur E. Sutherland, Bussey Professor of Law, disagreed, saying that he had "never heard anything bad about Rogers."

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags