News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
Apathy may represent the mood of the American voter toward the 1956 Presidential election, but certainly not that of Harvard University. Political organizations at the College and the Law School have shown an election-year variety of vitality in campaigning for local and national candidates on both tickets. Even Radcliffe has experienced a minor form of political awakening.
While the distaff politicos may simply be undergoing the sort of activity which blossoms every leap year and fades after election day, their Harvard cohorts are mainly engaged in building permanent organizations out of the seeds of election year enthusiasm. Of more than 2000 members of various political groups in the University, something more than half are enrolled in well-established clubs. The others are members of the Students for Stevenson, or the Students for Eisenhower--both temporary organizations.
Varied Motives
Many students, of course, do not participate in political clubs simply because the are inspired. Some may do it from expediency--a feeling that they can profit later in life by being associated with politics; others may wish to learn from contact with democratic (or possibly undemocratic) procedures. Certainly the wish to be a big frog, even in big pond like Harvard, motivates some to seek control of a club. Whatever the underlying urges are however, they are obviously awakening many young men and women to the political facts of our day.
Even those who simply wear a campaign button are subjected to political discussions in their dining halls and are forced to acquaint themselves with today's problems in order to keep up with the opposition. The enthusiasts, the workers, are brought into even closer touch with the issues and with other people through their work in a political club. The value of doorbell inging, for instance, should not be underestimated as an educational experience. The party worker, and particularly the college student, learn more about human relations in a night of trying to force propaganda on potential voters, than they could in any course in political or social behaviour.
Cambridge Campaign
The students for Stevenson have been perhaps the most active of the clubs this term. Although the hard core of Democratic workers has been drawn from already established groups, the Students for Stevenson, with a membership of 1,000--at 25 cents a head--has proved to be the moving force behind Democratic activity in Cambridge. Theodore L. Kesselman 3L, president of the group, first co-ordinated his efforts with those of the Cambridge Stevenson-Kefauver Volunteers in a drive to register Democratic voters in Cambridge. He then obtained the co-operation of the Harvard Young Democratic Club, the Harvard Liberal Union, and the Law School Young Democrats for the registration drive and later activities.
As a result of their joint efforts, the clubs have sold over 600 silver shoes at $1.00 apiece, helped in the student drive that raised $2,100 in downtown Boston on Dollars for Democrats Day, provided workers for the Cambridge fund-raising effort in which $3,500 was collected, and are at present working in 12 Cambridge precincts urging Democratic voters to go to the polls. Plans for meeting Adlai Stevenson, when he arrives in Boston October 28, have not yet been completely worked out. Final election day organization is not yet completely crystallized either, but present plans call for an all-day rotation of workers at various Cambridge polling places and a round of victory parties that night.
Optimistic Democrat
Commenting on the chances for Stevenson's success, Kesselman said, "I am quite sure that our efforts this year in Cambridge will give Governor Stevenson an even greater majority here than in 1952. The enthusiasm of the workers has far surpassed our most optimistic estimates."
The Law School Young Democratic Club, headed by Herbert Gleason 2L, has worked with the other Democratic clubs in the main activities, but has also sponsored projects outside of its major obligations. Workers have campaigned in Lexington for the national ticket and for Jimmy O'Dea, a candidate for district attorney and presently Democratic whip of the Massachusetts House of Representatives. Other groups from the Law School club, whose membership is over 200, have done canvassing and research for Jackson J. Holtz, Democratic challenger for the seat in the United States House now occupied by Lawrence Curtis.
Gleason's prototype in the College is William Cotter '58, president of the Harvard Young Democratic Club. The HYDC, having pooled its membership list with that of the HLU and the Students for Stevenson, has been doing much the same canvassing and pre-registration work in Cambridge as the other Democratic clubs. Its membership, now nearly 200, has also contributed to the Holtz campaign in Brighton, Brookline, and Newton. Aside from door-to-door canvassing, some workers participated in an opinion poll of Tenth District voters, to determine what issues Holtz might use to best advantage in his campaign there. The poll, prepared by Dr. Ithiel Pool, an MIT professor, is similar to the one used in California to permit Adlai Stevenson to exploit the most significant problems in his primary fight with Senator Estes Kefauver.
Perhaps, the most important contribution which the new executive board has made to political work in the college, is the publication of a mimeographed newspaper entitled The Democratic Review. The paper, which is distributed to every room in the college is the HYDC's hope to balance the effect of the Harvard Times-Republican. As the editorial board becomes more experienced, it plans to develop the paper into more of a vehicle for political commentary with less emphasis on straight news writing.
The Liberals
There is, however, another permanent political club which is consistently Democratic in its sentiment, the Harvard Liberal Union, the Harvard branch of the Students for Democratic Action. The group has cooperated in pooling its membership list, but has concentrated its main efforts on the candidacy of Jimmy O'Dea. Morris Goldings '57, former president and now Political Action Chairman, reported that the work of a small group of HLUers before the September Democratic primary was invaluable in gaining the nomination for O'Dea. O'Dea, a resident of Lowell carried that city with 25,000 votes, but could not have won with-the few extra Cambridge votes. The success of the Cambridge drive is in large measure attributable to the small group of HLUers who campaigned in the area for weeks before the fall term began.
The intensive activity and enforced cooperation between the pro-Stevenson groups is not paralleled in the clubs supporting Eisenhower. While there is no outright disunity, there is only what Don Hodel '57, president of the Harvard Young Republican Club, termed a "standing offer" to join forces with the Eisenhower Club, and perhaps with the Harvard Conservative League and the Harvard Conservative Club.
The HYRC, while engaging in canvassing, poster distributing, and secretarial work, is, for a large club--nearly 500 members, counting the 120 Law School Republicans--comparatively inactive. Through its subsidiary, the Students for Eisenhower, it has contributed to the efforts of Representative Lawrence Curtis and has co-operated with the Cambridge Republican organization as well as the Whittier headquarters in Boston. One Young Republican, displeased with the lack of activity in the HYRC, commented that the club was worried about not having done anything substantial, but felt that, barring a visit to Boston by President Eisenhower, there was little that the group could do at this late date.
Eisenhower Club
In contrast to the attitude of the HYRC, the Law School young Republicans, and the Students for Eisenhower, the Eisenhower Club has definite plans and commitments from now until election day. Morton Korn '57 stated that the Eisenhower Club, of which he is president, does not believe in "blanket endorsement" of all Republican candidates, but prefers to concentrate its work with one selected man who lives up to the philosophy of Eisenhower Republicanism. The Eisenhower Club has chosen Representative Curtis, who wrote them for assistance, as the local candidate for whom to campaign. Korn estimated that an average of five people a night had been going into the Tenth District from Harvard for the past three weeks. He predicted that this would be maintained right up until the election day, when members of his club would be on hand in the Curtis office and to do whatever needed to be done at the polling places. Korn said that some members of the canvassing parties had been from the Students for Eisenhower and that he still wished to co-operate with such clubs.
The Conservatives
Two Harvard groups, Republican in sentiment, but not political action organizations are the Conservative League and the Conservative Club. Edward S. Barnard, President of the HCC, commented that while his club encouraged its 25 members to campaign, it did not provide them with the opportunity to do so, as it did not wish to endorse a candidate of any particular party. He added that the group was "not being as active this year as last" but that he hoped to work up small discussion groups for club members. He mentioned his be-
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.