News

Community Safety Department Director To Resign Amid Tension With Cambridge Police Department

News

From Lab to Startup: Harvard’s Office of Technology Development Paves the Way for Research Commercialization

News

People’s Forum on Graduation Readiness Held After Vote to Eliminate MCAS

News

FAS Closes Barker Center Cafe, Citing Financial Strain

News

8 Takeaways From Harvard’s Task Force Reports

Debaters Split With Yale on Segregation

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

Crimson debaters won an unanimous decision over Yale in Cambridge last night while losing a unanimous decision in New Haven.

In Cambridge the Crimson upheld the negative side of the question of immediate desegregation in public schools and the affirmative side of the same question in New Haven.

The winning team of Gerald L. Cherry '56, Edward M. Ginsberg '55, and Richard M. Stenson '56 successfully argued that it was physically impossible and socially undesirable to "require immediate compliance with the Supreme Court decision outlawing segregation in the nation's public schools."

Admitting that "segregation should be ended as soon as possible," the Crimson debaters claimed that the disorder which might follow immediate desegregation would not improve Negro educational opportunities.

In New Haven the arguments were similar and the judges voted unanimously against Arthur J. Goldblatt '55, Alan S. Novick '55, and Jimmy R. Sikes '56.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags