News

Harvard Quietly Resolves Anti-Palestinian Discrimination Complaint With Ed. Department

News

Following Dining Hall Crowds, Harvard College Won’t Say Whether It Tracked Wintersession Move-Ins

News

Harvard Outsources Program to Identify Descendants of Those Enslaved by University Affiliates, Lays Off Internal Staff

News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Class Session With Gazan Patients, Calling It One-Sided

News

Garber Privately Tells Faculty That Harvard Must Rethink Messaging After GOP Victory

Debaters Split With Yale on Segregation

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

Crimson debaters won an unanimous decision over Yale in Cambridge last night while losing a unanimous decision in New Haven.

In Cambridge the Crimson upheld the negative side of the question of immediate desegregation in public schools and the affirmative side of the same question in New Haven.

The winning team of Gerald L. Cherry '56, Edward M. Ginsberg '55, and Richard M. Stenson '56 successfully argued that it was physically impossible and socially undesirable to "require immediate compliance with the Supreme Court decision outlawing segregation in the nation's public schools."

Admitting that "segregation should be ended as soon as possible," the Crimson debaters claimed that the disorder which might follow immediate desegregation would not improve Negro educational opportunities.

In New Haven the arguments were similar and the judges voted unanimously against Arthur J. Goldblatt '55, Alan S. Novick '55, and Jimmy R. Sikes '56.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags