News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

Jaffe Club Wins In Quarter-Final Ames Arguments

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

Jaffe Law Club won a close decision over Gladstone-Webster last night in the second of the quarter-final Ames debates held at Langdell courtroom.

Second year students Richard J. Barrett and Monroe H. Freedman of Jaffe were the winning finalists, while Gladstone-Webster was represented by Edward Eyre and Richard J. Feinberg, Freedman and Barnett will argue in the semi-finals next fall as third year students.

The two clubs argued a case of conflicting laws in two states, Florida and a mythical "Commonwealth of Ames." The question involved whether an oral agreement not to change a will, which was legal when made in Florida, should be invalidated in "Ames" where the agreement was not legal.

Eugene A. Hudson, Justice of the Massachusetts Superior Court, and lawyers Ralph G. Boyd '22 and Charles W. Blood '99, who served as judges, found all the briefs "exceptionally well written" but gave Jaffe the decision.

Last Tuesday, Gardner defeated Frankfurter Law in the first of the Ames quarter finals.

The Ames arguments will continue next week.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags