News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

Rosenberg Denial Draws Comments

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

President Eisenhower's refusal to grant executive clemency to Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, convicted atomic bomb spies, brought a sharp divergence of opinion from members of the University faculty yesterday.

Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. '38, associate professor of History, expressed approval of the decision, terming it "the only sensible thing to do." He added, 'For once, I agree with General Eisenhower."

In disagreement with Schlesinger, Mark DeWolfe Howe '28, professor of Law, called the President's action "a disappointment." While emphasizing that he was not "passionately concerned," Howe said, "I'd thought that a combination of mercy and courage would have led the President to commute the sentences. It would have been a credit to him to do it."

Howe concluded, "I thought Eisenhower was in a position to do it where Truman was not, on political grounds."

Arthur E. Sutherland, professor of Law, declined to comment directly on Eisenhower's rejection of the appeal, saying only, "I suppose that it lies within the President's power to do so."

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags