News
Shark Tank Star Kevin O’Leary Judges Six Harvard Startups at HBS Competition
News
The Return to Test Requirements Shrank Harvard’s Applicant Pool. Will It Change Harvard Classrooms?
News
HGSE Program Partners with States to Evaluate, Identify Effective Education Policies
News
Planning Group Releases Proposed Bylaws for a Faculty Senate at Harvard
News
How Cambridge’s Political Power Brokers Shape the 2025 Election
Two professors here last night endorsed Attorney General Herbert Browneill's new plan to grant immunity to balky congressional witnesses.
Arthur E. Sutherland, professor of Law, and Robert G. McCloskey, associate professor of Government, have come out in favor of legislation that would give Brownell as Attorney General the power to grant immunity. If a witness then refused to testify, he could face imprisonment for contempt of Congress. This plan was suggested by Brownell for the first time yesterday at the National Press Club.
Along with it came the announcement that President Eisenhower and authorized the heads of the departments of state to fire any Federal employee who refused to testify before a congressional investigating committee on grounds of self incrimination.
"The Fifth Amendment must not be looked at exclusively in the light of the Communist problem," Sutherland cautioned. He added that because of the "overuse" of the Amendment a new immunity law would probably aid the efficiency of congressional investigations.
McCloskey noted that while the Fifth Amendment might seem unworkable, it was still the law of the land, and people should not be punished for exercising their constitutional rights. Rather, the law should be changed if unworkable.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.