News
After Court Restores Research Funding, Trump Still Has Paths to Target Harvard
News
‘Honestly, I’m Fine with It’: Eliot Residents Settle In to the Inn as Renovations Begin
News
He Represented Paul Toner. Now, He’s the Fundraising Frontrunner in Cambridge’s Municipal Elections.
News
Harvard College Laundry Prices Increase by 25 Cents
News
DOJ Sues Boston and Mayor Michelle Wu ’07 Over Sanctuary City Policy
Two professors here last night endorsed Attorney General Herbert Browneill's new plan to grant immunity to balky congressional witnesses.
Arthur E. Sutherland, professor of Law, and Robert G. McCloskey, associate professor of Government, have come out in favor of legislation that would give Brownell as Attorney General the power to grant immunity. If a witness then refused to testify, he could face imprisonment for contempt of Congress. This plan was suggested by Brownell for the first time yesterday at the National Press Club.
Along with it came the announcement that President Eisenhower and authorized the heads of the departments of state to fire any Federal employee who refused to testify before a congressional investigating committee on grounds of self incrimination.
"The Fifth Amendment must not be looked at exclusively in the light of the Communist problem," Sutherland cautioned. He added that because of the "overuse" of the Amendment a new immunity law would probably aid the efficiency of congressional investigations.
McCloskey noted that while the Fifth Amendment might seem unworkable, it was still the law of the land, and people should not be punished for exercising their constitutional rights. Rather, the law should be changed if unworkable.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.