News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

Red Trial Unfair; Love Hits Biased Rosenberg Judge

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

A Northwestern University professor last night charged Federal Judge Irving R. Kaufman with "putting words into the witnesses' mouths" in the espionage trial of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg.

Speaking before the Harvard Law Forum, Stephen Love, professor of Law at Northwestern, called for President Truman to reduce the death penalty sentence given to the Rosenbergs.

Love seriously doubted their guilt, saying it was impossible for the Los Alamos mechanic who allegedly gave the Rosenberg's vital atom secrets to have sketched from memory in two hours a twelve page manuscript as the the mechanic claimed.

The professor asserted that Judge Kaufman's had interjected his own bias into the preceedings over 100 times, "helping out government witnesses and making smaller defense witnesses."

Arthur E. Sutherland, professor of Law, gave a short rebuttal to Love's argument, stating Kaufman's interference was not great enough to merit importance and that the Rosenberg's middle man--the mechanic--could have given valuable material.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags