News
After Court Restores Research Funding, Trump Still Has Paths to Target Harvard
News
‘Honestly, I’m Fine with It’: Eliot Residents Settle In to the Inn as Renovations Begin
News
He Represented Paul Toner. Now, He’s the Fundraising Frontrunner in Cambridge’s Municipal Elections.
News
Harvard College Laundry Prices Increase by 25 Cents
News
DOJ Sues Boston and Mayor Michelle Wu ’07 Over Sanctuary City Policy
Two highly partisan professors hurled political barbs at each other's presidential candidate before an overflow audience of 350 in the Kirkland Junior Common Room last night. However, both Samuel H. Beer and McGeorge Bundy, associate professors of Government, agreed that foreign policy considerations were the vital issue in this campaign.
Eisenhower will have much difficulty in carrying out his foreign policy goals, Beer asserted, "unless he has a Democratic House and Senate." A Republican controlled Congress would be led by Taft and his followers, who think "foreign policy should be adjusted by expenditures" rather than vice versa, Beer said.
Pointing to the international record of the Vandenburg-led Republicans in the 80th Congress, Bundy said, "Anything Van could do, Ike can do better." He claimed that an opposition party, frustrated and long out of power, tends to lose irresponsibility and act constructively once it regains power.
Beer claimed the evils of McCarthyism would increase with a GOP victory. Bundy, however, countered that Eisenhower could control the Wisconsin senator more effectively than Stevenson.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.