News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

Grasping the Bull by the Horns

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

The well-established art of bullslinging on essay examinations will receive a mortal blow on June eight. Professor D. C. McKay is requiring that his History 133 students limit the number of words written on the long final essay question.

This move should help out in two ways. Eassay quality should improve and correctors will not be forced to plough through as many pages of garbage as they have in the past. This last point is important.

With tighter-knit bluebooks to correct, graders will be able to go over each one more carefully. These men will also have the time either to write longer marginal comments in the examination books, or to discuss them individually. There will no longer be any excuse for not returning blue books to their authors.

If this is the result of Professor McKay's experiment, the new method should be adopted quickly by other courses--especially those who only find time to attach a number to their final examinations.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags