News
Garber Privately Tells Faculty That Harvard Must Rethink Messaging After GOP Victory
News
Cambridge Assistant City Manager to Lead Harvard’s Campus Planning
News
Despite Defunding Threats, Harvard President Praises Former Student Tapped by Trump to Lead NIH
News
Person Found Dead in Allston Apartment After Hours-Long Barricade
News
‘I Am Really Sorry’: Khurana Apologizes for International Student Winter Housing Denials
Two local doctors will attack the $25 assessment of members by the American Medical Association to combat government health insurance at the Physicians' Forum at the Medical School tonight.
The pair have sketched their objections to the assessment in the latest New England Journal of Medicine. Dr. Allan M. Butler, professor of Pediatrics, fears that doctors, particularly younger ones, who don't pay the assessment may lose their AMA membership and thus have trouble getting hospital positions.
Would Double Income
"If AMA membership depends on paying an assessment which more than doubles the AMA's income and which is used to oppose the policy of the President of the United States and the majority of Congress," Dr. Butler declared, "the AMA's major purpose becomes not only political but highly controversial."
Dr. Henry S. Forbes '05, also writing in the journal, charges that there is no evidence that the money "will be used in an unbiased search for facts or in the promotion of impartial discussion." He suspects that the actual purpose is to influence opinion in one direction by presenting one side of a controversial issue."
"I believe it is unethical," Forbes stated, "and until a referendum is held. I have no intention of paying this tax."
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.