News

Penny Pritzker Says She Has ‘Absolutely No Idea’ How Trump Talks Will Conclude

News

Harvard Researchers Find Executive Function Tests May Be Culturally Biased

News

Researchers Release Report on People Enslaved by Harvard-Affiliated Vassall Family

News

Zusy Seeks First Full Term for Cambridge City Council

News

NYT Journalist Maggie Haberman Weighs In on Trump’s White House, Democratic Strategy at Harvard Talk

House Begins Hearings on Portal Suits; Tel Aviv Official Reports British Set Seven-Day Ultimatum

House Discusses Portal Suits

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

WASHINGTON, February 3--A proposal by Rep. Walter (D-Pa.) that the Supreme Court recall the master portal pay case and "lay down a clear-cut yard-stick" for such claims marked the start today of House hearings on the $5,000,000,000 problem.

A Supreme Court decision involving employees of the Mt. Clemens, Mich., Pottery Co., has led to the filing of some $5,000,000,000 in portal suits.

"I think," Walter declared, "the Supreme Court ought to recall that case, assume jurisdiction again, and lay down a clearcut yardstick. The Supreme Court would be derelict in its duty to the people generally if it did not do that."

He is a member of the House judiciary subcommittee which began hearings on bills to outlaw the claims with a plea from the Chamber of Commerce of the United States for fast action.

Milton A. Smith, assistant General Counsel of the Chamber, said portal suits "pose a threat of bankruptcy to concerns which are the backbone of the American economic system."

A Senate judiciary subcommittee held hearings last month and is considering legislation now.

Upholding a decision by Federal district judge Frank Picard in the Mt. Clemens case, the Supreme Court held that employers are liable for pay for time employees must spend on their property, even though it is not spent at productive labor.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags