News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil
News
Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum
News
Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta
News
After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct
News
Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds
Just 24 hours after the introduction of his price-freeze resolution on the Senate floor, Homer E. Capehart debated price policies with Leon H. Keyserling, a member of the President's Economic Advisory Council, before the Law School Forum last night.
A total absence of partisan politics characterized the debate at the Rindge Tech Auditorium, although the speakers differed sharply in regard to the nature of the inflation problem, as well as to its solution.
The Senator blamed high prices solely on insufficient production. He proposed to extend the work week in order to encourage greater output and higher real wages. Other points on his program were a priority system for scarce commodities, and the four-months price-freeze legislation.
Keyserling Analysis
Keyserling fixed the blame for high prices not on low production, but on mal-distribution of income.
"Profits which are so high that they cannot be absorbed by investment, remain unspent and reduce consumer purchasing power," he explained. Keyser-ling also noted that the spending of war time savings, reconversion investments, and European aid buoy up the economy temporarily, but warned that a severe depression was inevitable unless income distribution is improved.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.