News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil
News
Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum
News
Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta
News
After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct
News
Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds
"Neither the British White Paper (issued by the British Government last spring) nor the Murray Full Employment Bill undertakes to guarantee, as is sometimes mistakenly supposed, a job to every individual," explains Alvin H. Hansen, Lucius N. Littauer Professor of Political Economy, in an article appearing in the first issue of the Harvard Progressive, to be distributed this week.
"What they do aim to achieve," says Professor Hanson, "is a condition in which job opportunities are available. What is aimed at is that the total demand for goods and services shall be adequate to provide employment for the entire labor force, seasonal and transitional unemployment considered.
"The Murray Bill emphasizes the importance of high levels of production, employment, business volume, and rising living standards. It is essentially a planning bill."
Professor Hansen discusses both the institutional elements of the Murray Bill and its economic purposes. "The Murray Bill," he says, "emphasizes ways and means of increasing the volume of private capital outlays. It recognizes that there are important services needed under modern conditions which only government can perform, which cannot be undertaken by private means.
"The Murray Bill, however, stresses again and again the role of private enterprise and puts the emphasis upon private consumption and private investment outlays."
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.