News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil
News
Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum
News
Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta
News
After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct
News
Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds
Speaking to an overflow audience in Langdell Hall last night, Edwin S. Smith '15, member of the National Labor Relations Board, expressed his disapproval of the additions f new amendments to the Wagner Act.
Introduced as a business man and not a lawyer, he said that most of the cases of the Board were settled informally without forced court action. Therein lies the chief virtue of such quasi judicial groups as the board, he added.
Most of the talk was devoted to relating the functions and experiences of the Board, ending with his own general opinions on the proposed amendments by the Smith Committee, whose chairman, he explained, was absolutely no relation.
Defending the work of the Board and refuting the popular accusation that it is biased in favor of either the AFL or CIO he showed that in the whole history of the Board, each of the labor unions has benefited in over 7,000 cases.
He also demonstrated that, contrary to public opinion, there were less strikes in 1938 than since 1932.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.