News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
"In the case of an English victory there is at least the possibility of a decent international regime," whereas in the event of a Nazi victory there is none at all, Professor Michael Karpovich concluded last night during an address on the differences between English and German imperialism, sponsored by the Student Defense League.
One of the principle distinctions between the two imperialisms is that the British is already established, whereas success of the German policies of expansion would involve "enormous" cost to the world, Karpovich said. "The very fact that British imperialism is static is a point in its favor."
"I cannot ignore the idealogical issues," Karpovich continued. The spread of totalitarianism means the destruction of democracy and constitutional government. Bismarck could leave conquered nations alone. Hitler cannot." British imperial expansion on the other hand, has extended the domains of democracy, the speaker pointed out.
With respect to the enormous army that the United States is raising Professor Karpovich commented. "Once you've got it why not use it to further your own interests?" He emphasized that the main job on hand at present however, was preparedness.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.