News

Harvard Quietly Resolves Anti-Palestinian Discrimination Complaint With Ed. Department

News

Following Dining Hall Crowds, Harvard College Won’t Say Whether It Tracked Wintersession Move-Ins

News

Harvard Outsources Program to Identify Descendants of Those Enslaved by University Affiliates, Lays Off Internal Staff

News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Class Session With Gazan Patients, Calling It One-Sided

News

Garber Privately Tells Faculty That Harvard Must Rethink Messaging After GOP Victory

WELLESLEY DEBATERS ATTACK EQUAL RIGHTS

HARVARD WOULD BE CO-ED' CLAIM WELLESLEYITES

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

In a topsy-turvy radio discussion yesterday afternoon Crimson debaters defended the "Equal Rights for Women" amendment against the attacks of a Wellesley team that suggested that passage of the amendment might mean that Harvard college "might have to admit women onto its sacred premises."

Taking the affirmative on the question, "Resolved: That Congress should pass the Equal Rights Amendment" were Malcolm R. Wilkey '40 and Eno W. Hobbing '40. Ruth Frankel, Chairman of the Debate Club and Margaret Delahanty, President-Elect of the Wellesley Forum, argued against the amendment on the grounds that it would destroy the present program of "specific bills for specific ills."

This was the fourth and last of a series of debate broadcasts sponsored by the Debating Council.

The Crimson based its case for the amendment on the fact that present specific legislation designed to benefit workers has in many cases actually thrown many women out of work and cited many examples of civil rights being denied to women by state and local governments.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags