News
Harvard Quietly Resolves Anti-Palestinian Discrimination Complaint With Ed. Department
News
Following Dining Hall Crowds, Harvard College Won’t Say Whether It Tracked Wintersession Move-Ins
News
Harvard Outsources Program to Identify Descendants of Those Enslaved by University Affiliates, Lays Off Internal Staff
News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Class Session With Gazan Patients, Calling It One-Sided
News
Garber Privately Tells Faculty That Harvard Must Rethink Messaging After GOP Victory
DEBATERS EVEN COUNT BY VANQUISHING ELIS
Crimson Team Takes Affirmative Side On Subject of New Deal as Attempt For Power
Evening the count with the Elis to whom they lost last Friday at New Haven, the Crimson debaters tonight scored a victory by the unanimous decision of the three judges ever Yale at the Boston Public Library.
The subject, which was the same as that argued at Yale, was: Resolved That the New Deal is more interested in political power than in the welfare of the people. Harvard lost on the negative at New Haven, but won last night when defending the affirmative.
For the Crimson, Paul W. Cherington '40 led off and made the rebuttal speech. Other speakers for the Crimson were Sanford Marshall '41 and Henry Oyen '41. The Yale men were Henry Shultz '39, Henry Kohn '39, and Hart Spiegel '40.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.