News

Adams Alumni Go Nuts for Newly Renovated House

News

A Better Cambridge Announces Endorsements in City Council Race, Giving Boost to Incumbents

News

HUA Kicks Off With Inaugural Meeting Under New Administration

News

Harvard Ends Undergraduate Minority Recruitment Program as Trump Targets Race in Admissions

News

Memorial Church Reduces Programming Amid University Budget Cuts

NON-DECISION DEBATES

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

Harvard's Debating Council persists in its tendency to engage in non-decision debates. Stanford was met last evening, a gentlemanly discussion indulged in, but no evaluation of the merits of the opponents was attempted. Thus, under the guise of an impartial platitudinous forum intellectualism continues its devitalizing path.

It has been pleaded in justification of non-decision forensics that both sides contain a measure of truth and that a verdict distorts out of their proper weight the arguments presented, but surely this is just a rationalization. Legislative bodies approve or vote down proposals. Scientists after the submission of evidence, choose between two hypotheses.

This type of debate has been seized on by schools that either because of laziness, enervation, or inadequate faculty assistance, are not "in form" to meet their opponents. But this shrinking from a decision besides being a symptom of declining spirit, lessens the lure that debating would have for powerful active natures.

If it is a trouncing that is feared, it would be better ot extend the Council's policy toward Boston College. In that instance after innumerable defeats by better prepared men, the debate was crossed off the schedule.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags