News

After Court Restores Research Funding, Trump Still Has Paths to Target Harvard

News

‘Honestly, I’m Fine with It’: Eliot Residents Settle In to the Inn as Renovations Begin

News

He Represented Paul Toner. Now, He’s the Fundraising Frontrunner in Cambridge’s Municipal Elections.

News

Harvard College Laundry Prices Increase by 25 Cents

News

DOJ Sues Boston and Mayor Michelle Wu ’07 Over Sanctuary City Policy

CRIMSON DEBATERS BOW TO M.I.T. FORENSIC UNION

DUGGAN, DUNN, FULD REPRESENT DEBATING COUNCIL

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

Through the majority decision of three judges, a trio of M. I. T. orators was awarded a close victory over the Harvard Debating Council last night. Discussion centered on the advisability of granting Congress constitutional power to regulate all commerce and industry within the United States.

Upholding the negative side of the question, the Crimson team charged that the adoption of such an amendment would bring about an unwarranted revolutionary change in the economic and political order of the country. Warning that such a step would arm Congress with dangerous prerogatives, they declared that the inevitable result would involve extinction of personal rights and the triumph of authoritarian government.

As a rational solution to present economic problems, they urged the adoption of a less sweeping amendment specifying and definitely limiting the industrial and commercial powers granted to Congress.

Representing the Crimson in last night's contest were Edward J. Duggan '37, Robert Dunn '37, and James J. Fuld '37.

The chief argument of the opposing forces rested on the thesis that the Constitution, no longer able to cope with contemporary problems, should be amended to meet the demands of present day society.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags