OFF THE TRACK

Upon close inspection, few people would believe in war, Fascism, or retrenchment in education. Yet the National Student League, with precisely the same opinions, has found that its existence at Harvard this year has aroused strong opposition. The difficulty lies in their method of attack, not in their principles.

Not only have they failed to put their program across, but their attempts to do so have diverted attention from their purposes. The piece meeting on Widener steps degenerated into a farce because the large proportion of the student body considered the proceedings ridiculous. To these men who also want peace the fundamental questions of practicality seemed neglected. Claiming freedom of speech, they are apparently unwilling to let Mr. Hanfstaengl come here and say what he pleases. Then on Tuesday there was Mr. Philbrick's puerile attempt to board a foreign cruiser visiting in our waters, with the purpose of distributing pamphlets against that country's government. Not only was it an act of discourtesy, but it lends the League a radical tinge. It is these hysterical, though probably sincere, publicity stunts which have destroyed their prestige.

Obviously the NSL is in need of reform. Idealistic appeals to the emotions will not satisfy the practical minded undergraduate, and it is this support which the League should attempt to attain. The abolition of activities, such as the previously mentioned ones, would be the first step in the right direction. Those really interested should hold regular meetings and discuss among themselves the steps which are necessary to bring their purpose to fruition. Not only a sane consideration of the problems facing them now but proposals for the future when they have removed the cankers certainly supply the NSL with food for thought. It is in small meetings, away from the glare of the spotlight, where practical remedies can be suggested.