News

Harvard Quietly Resolves Anti-Palestinian Discrimination Complaint With Ed. Department

News

Following Dining Hall Crowds, Harvard College Won’t Say Whether It Tracked Wintersession Move-Ins

News

Harvard Outsources Program to Identify Descendants of Those Enslaved by University Affiliates, Lays Off Internal Staff

News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Class Session With Gazan Patients, Calling It One-Sided

News

Garber Privately Tells Faculty That Harvard Must Rethink Messaging After GOP Victory

Debating Audiences Support Roosevelt Here and at Yale

Question Decided on Its Merits, Not By Debating Teams

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

New Haven, October 31--By a vote of 131 to 94, the audience at the Harvard-Yale debate here tonight supported Roosevelt despite the opposition of the Harvard debating team.

A vote of confidence was also given the Roosevelt Administration by the audience here last night after the other Harvard and Yale debaters had met in the Winthrop House Common Room. Owing to the small attendance, the question, "Resolved: That the welfare of the country demands a vote of confidence in the Administration in the coming congressional elections," was decided solely on its merits rather than on the skill of the teams. The vote was two to one for the new deal.

The affirmative was upheld by Powers McLean '35, Oscar M. Lurie '35, and James J. Fuld '37 of Harvard, who maintained that destruction of the new deal would destroy the bright future of the Administration. The negative team from Yale, Edward H. Kenyon '37, Walter W. Rostow '36, and John Strauss '35, gave figures to show that the new deal was "a means not justifying the end." Fredrick doW, Bolman '33, President of the Debating Council, presided at the meeting.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags