News

After Court Restores Research Funding, Trump Still Has Paths to Target Harvard

News

‘Honestly, I’m Fine with It’: Eliot Residents Settle In to the Inn as Renovations Begin

News

He Represented Paul Toner. Now, He’s the Fundraising Frontrunner in Cambridge’s Municipal Elections.

News

Harvard College Laundry Prices Increase by 25 Cents

News

DOJ Sues Boston and Mayor Michelle Wu ’07 Over Sanctuary City Policy

DRINKER DENIES CONNECTION WITH COLLINS COMPANY

Charges By Nelson Littell Are False Says Guild--Royalties Only Money Paid By Manufacturer

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

"Professor Drinker has no connection with the respirator-patent suit now being pressed by Warren E. Collins, Inc. against J. H. Emerson, or any financial interest in the Collins company," H. R. Guild '17, attorney for Drinker, asserted last night in a denial of charges that Drinker is a secret stock holder in the Collins company and is supplying financial aid in the law suit to determine the validity of the respirator patents now held by Collins.

This denial was caused by a statement made to Emerson, Collins' rival in the manufacture of respirators, by Nelson Littell, of New York City, attorney for Warren E. Collins, Inc. Emerson states that during the course of his talk with Littell, the lawyer said, "Professor Drinker is paying for part of this law suit, and new patent applications have been filed in his name." Littell now denies this.

According to Guild, both Drinker and Collins have agreed that the entire cost of the suit is to be borne by Collins, and Drinker's sole connection with the case will be that of a witness. He admitted that new patents have been filed in Drinker's name, but said that was solely to satisfy the requirement of the United States patent law that all patents must be filed in the name of an individual rather than a corporation.

Guild also flatly refuted the charge that Drinker holds stock in the Collins company. "My client has never held any stock in Collins' firm; the sole remuneration he has gained from his invention was royalties from the sales of the first Drinker model," Guild said. This charge had been circulated by several magazines and newspapers.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags