News

Garber Privately Tells Faculty That Harvard Must Rethink Messaging After GOP Victory

News

Cambridge Assistant City Manager to Lead Harvard’s Campus Planning

News

Despite Defunding Threats, Harvard President Praises Former Student Tapped by Trump to Lead NIH

News

Person Found Dead in Allston Apartment After Hours-Long Barricade

News

‘I Am Really Sorry’: Khurana Apologizes for International Student Winter Housing Denials

ABOLITION OF OLD PLAN OF ENTRANCE URGED IN REPORT

Harvard Committee States Cramming Encouraged--School Record Should Be Further Emphasized

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

Based on the general reasoning that entrance examinations are an inadequate test of a man's ability, in that they test memory rather than ability to think or reason, the abandonment of the so-called "Old Plan" examinations is advocated in the latest report of the Overseers' committee on Harvard College. The committee in advocating the changing of the present system of admission also expresses the opinion "that the methods of testing applicants for admission should be diversified enough to make possible a check of one method by several others."

The portion of the report which refers to admission requirements reads as follows: "The old method of entrance was by examination and points. The disadvantages of this policy soon became obvious. Entrance requirements are an inadequate test and cover only one of many requisite things that the College wishes to know about an applicant. They test memory rather than ability to think or reason. They test knowledge and not appreciation. They encourage cramming... such examinations are not a true test of a boy's capacity to take the college course."

School Record Emphasized

After mentioning in what ways Harvard has led in revision of entrance requirement arrangements, the report treats the New Plan under which the importance of the examination is intended to grow less, more influence being placed on the school record, on quality, and on the capacity of the boy to do the work.

Concerning the examinations, the committee mentions the fundamental failing in an examination system, due to the fact that a large variance exists in the marking standards of various readers, despite the best of standardized systems of marking used by the College Entrance Board. Concerning even an exact a science as mathematics for example, the committee found that in "a study of markings of the algebra and geometry examinations of the College Entrance Examination Board revealed an amazing variance in the individual judgments of the different examiners. The correlation between random markings of the algebra examination was only .61.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags