News

Cambridge Nonprofits Struggle to Fill Gap Left By SNAP Delay

News

At Harvard Talk, Princeton President Says Colleges Should Set Clear Time, Manner, Place Rules for Protests

News

In Tug-of-War Over Harvard Salient’s Future, Board of Directors Lawyers Up

News

Cambridge Elects 2 Challengers with 7 Incumbents to City Council

News

‘We Need More Setti Warrens’: IOP Director and Newton Mayor Remembered for Rare Drive to Serve

DIGESTING PROHIBITION

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

That inquisitive journal the Literary Digest, is now conducting a nationwide poll on Prohibition. The vote conducted two years ago on this subject proved little, since in offering three alternatives, repeal, modification, and enforcement, no one received a majority of votes. Though the earlier Prohibition poll was inconclusive, the presidential poll of 1928 proved to be surprisingly accurate. The present questionnaire, offering only two choices, will probably decide with equal exactitude the sentiment of the American voters. Th large number of replies already counted show a decided wet majority in every state. Although the method of choosing voters prevented a completely typical cross-section, this result, as in 1928 indicates the belief of the American people.

If a large majority for either side is reached in this poll the results may be decidedly beneficial. It covers a sufficiently large sector of the population to enable a politician to judge the trend of his constituents' convictions. To all except a few fanatics, Prohibition has, even in daily conversation, dwindled in importance. Could the candidates for office frankly discard this question, their election would be decided on more consequential issues of economic relief and international cooperation.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags