News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

FOOL'S DAY

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

Oliver Gerrett's many friends will be glad to hear that his case has again been dismissed. Although a third trial may be forced by his accusers, it is safe to say there will be no conviction.

His persecution has, in many ways, been similar to that of Alfred Dreyfus, thirty years ago. Both were the objects of popular calumny. Both were public servants acting in the performance of their, duty. The happy difference lies in the fact that whereas Dreyfus was convicted, Garrett is free.

Massachusetts has not fared well in its reputation for faithful judicial procedure. The Sacco-Vanzetti case still stands as a blot in the 'scutcheon. Now it has been demonstrated that the legal machinery of Massachusetts can and does insure a "fair and speedy trial", the constitutional right of every citizen.

It is unfortunate that Mr. Garrett may still have to endure a third unsuccessful trial. But, together with the vindication of the jury system by the present dismissal, comes the pleasant realization that he may once more walk a free man, among free men in the Ritz Rathskeller Bar.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags