News
Summers Will Not Finish Semester of Teaching as Harvard Investigates Epstein Ties
News
Harvard College Students Report Favoring Divestment from Israel in HUA Survey
News
‘He Should Resign’: Harvard Undergrads Take Hard Line Against Summers Over Epstein Scandal
News
Harvard To Launch New Investigation Into Epstein’s Ties to Summers, Other University Affiliates
News
Harvard Students To Vote on Divestment From Israel in Inaugural HUA Election Survey
Replying to the challenge of the Harvard Socialist Club for a public debate on the question of public ownership of public utilities, T. N. Carver, David A. Wells professor of political economy, said in a letter to the club that he declined the invitation.
The letter stated that the subject was not important enough to merit the expenditure of the energy necessary to prepare a public debate. Continuing, it said that pressing requirements of other projects prevented acceptance. Professor Carver refused to make any additional statements yesterday afternoon, declaring that the letter stated his position clearly and the next move fell to the Socialist Club.
Commenting on the answer received from Professor Carver, A. R. Whitman '34, president of the Socialist Club, declared that the matter was dead for the present at least. He said he could not agree with the stand taken on the importance of the public ownership, when the question concerns a necessity and not a luxury, and especially since it is becoming prominent as a national issue. Since Professor Carver is a recognized authority on economic questions, Whitman was of the opinion that his arguments made in public would be of great interest and value. He further stated that the invitation to debate will remain open and that he hoped Professor Carver will find it possible to accept at some time in the future.
The reply to the Socialist Club, signed by Professor Carver, follows in full:
"I do not think that the subject which you mention is of sufficient importance to warrant the expenditure of such energy as a public debate would require. Besides, I am very busily engaged with other projects. For these and other reasons I am afraid that I shall have to decline your invitation to debate.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.