News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil
News
Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum
News
Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta
News
After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct
News
Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds
In his address to the Yale Alumni University Fund Association President Angell brings into further prominence a question that is being widely discussed whenever the future of intercollegiate athletics is brought up. Although Yale is apparently committed by the president's speech to a policy opposed to the endowment plan, the reasons set forth do not seem to challenge the validity of the arguments that have previously been advanced in favor of subsidy.
It does not seem likely that anyone will disagree with President Angell's contention that university endowments should not suffer at the hands of an athletic fund. Proponents of the athletic endowment look for its creation by special contributions and do not expect such donations to detract from the usual source of university revenue.
All the advantages that are claimed for the athletic subside freedom of the student from excessive gate tax, elimination of the temptation to commercialize, and stability for the budget remain to be exploded before one can agree with President Augell's stand.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.