News

Summers Will Not Finish Semester of Teaching as Harvard Investigates Epstein Ties

News

Harvard College Students Report Favoring Divestment from Israel in HUA Survey

News

‘He Should Resign’: Harvard Undergrads Take Hard Line Against Summers Over Epstein Scandal

News

Harvard To Launch New Investigation Into Epstein’s Ties to Summers, Other University Affiliates

News

Harvard Students To Vote on Divestment From Israel in Inaugural HUA Election Survey

BOOKS

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

The announcement by the largest book publisher in the country of its intention to slash the prices of popular books from $2.50 and $2.00 to $1.00 is likely to lead to a considerable upset in the industry in general. By some it is interpreted as a temporary strategic move on the part of the publisher in question to drive into the ground the large amount of competition from small firms which has grown up under the protective wing of monopoly prices. Still others think the change once adopted will be permanent. Book publishing has the character of a monopoly industry, and consequently prices have always been a question of tapping the demand curve at the most profitable point. The introduction of the competitive element in the form of a price war might well uncover the fact that publishers can make more money out of increased sales resulting from price reduction.

At all events the high prices which people have been forced to pay for popular literature has had anything but a beneficial effect on the reading public. It has driven a great many into the class of magazine readers; it has lead to a false sense of value with regard to a lot of stuff which sells for over $2.00 and is actually worth practically nothing. And finally it has kept books from a great many people who would be ready buyers at lower prices.

Whatever the motives of the present move on the part of the New York house, no one can help hoping that the price cut will be permanent.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags