News
Garber Privately Tells Faculty That Harvard Must Rethink Messaging After GOP Victory
News
Cambridge Assistant City Manager to Lead Harvard’s Campus Planning
News
Despite Defunding Threats, Harvard President Praises Former Student Tapped by Trump to Lead NIH
News
Person Found Dead in Allston Apartment After Hours-Long Barricade
News
‘I Am Really Sorry’: Khurana Apologizes for International Student Winter Housing Denials
The Editor of the CRIMSON:
I have been greatly troubled (and not only I, but also many of my acquaintances) by a single phrase in this morning's editorial on the new requirements for admission. In commending the proposed plan, the editorial notes that it helps to exclude from college a large unassimilable element, which includes "commuters". Now, thus to separate goats and sheep is most perturbing, especially since this classification is not zoological, but is based on a question of habitat.
Asido from this initial difficulty, what of the commuter (to drop our metaphor) who, changing his locale, comes to live at the college; or what of him that abandons dormitory-life for residence at home? Does the first become, tipso facto, "assimilated", and the second, vice versa?
These questions strike home, in my own case. For three years, I was a technical unassimilable: I lived at home. But this year, I moved to college quarters. Am I now assimilated? Or must I pass the rest of my life under a cloud as threatening as it is vague?
In other words, is the mind still its own place? F. Y. St. Clair, '26.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.